Skip to main content

Tier 1 Geomorphic Unit Protocol

The Tier 1 Geomorphic Unit Protocol is the preliminary assessment of a valley bottom. This protocol helps identify and categorize Tier 1 geomorphic units, or ‘building blocks’, of a riverscape, as well as define the lateral boundaries (i.e., margins) of the valley bottom.

The main purpose of this protocol is to inventory the resources that define a riverscape’s setting. This provides crucial insights into the natural and human-caused processes that shape a valley bottom. From this, a deeper understanding of channel form & function, geomorphic condition, and riparian health can be understood (Bennet et al. 2019). Furthermore, this protocol identifies sources of current or past human development or natural disturbances that influence or have altered the riverscape.

By understanding these processes, you can tailor more effective restoration actions that target key components of your riverscape and maximize ecological uplift. This includes setting realistic goals, managing expectations, and assessing potential risks in your riverscape (Bennet et al. 2019). Therefore, this protocol should be the first (and most important) step of the LTPBR planning phase.

The Tier 1 protocol should be completed before digitization of pre-project monitoring, design, or as-built implementation. Within QRiS, you can add this protocol to your project by right clicking on the Data Capture Events container, selecting the Low-Tech Process-Based Restoration option, and clicking on Add New Planning Container.

Protocol Summary

AttributeValue
NameTier 1 Geomorphic Unit Protocol
StatusExperimental Grade
Version1.0
XML URLhttps://github.com/Riverscapes/RiverscapesXML/blob/master/QRiS/protocols/tier_1_geounit_protocol.xml
CitationBurgert et al. 2025. Tier 1 Geomorphic Unit Protocol. Prepared by Anabranch Solutions.
AuthorZach Burgert

How to Use

The following step-by-step guide will show you how to map your riverscape using this protocol.

  • Start by digitizing the channel lines within the valley bottom to map the location of the river network.
  • Next, digitize all Tier 1 geomorphic units to identify the landforms that fundamentally shape the valley bottom.
  • Then digitize the margins of the active channel(s), valley bottom, valley, and anthropogenic features to define their extents.
  • Finally, determine which mapped margins are ‘confining’. These are the features that constrain a channel's form or function and set the physical limits of the riverscape.

Once those layers are digitized, you can calculate metrics to assess the valley bottom’s condition and its restoration potential. These include:

  • Confining Margin Length: Total length of all confining margins.
  • Confinement Ratio: Proportion of channel length confined by the valley bottom, valley, or anthropogenic margins.
  • Constriction Ratio: Proportion of channel length constricted by the valley bottom, valley, or anthropogenic margins.
  • Active Channel Ratio: The ratio of active channel area to valley bottom area.
  • Active Floodplain Ratio: The ratio of active floodplain area to valley bottom area.
  • Inactive Floodplain Ratio: The ratio of inactive floodplain area to valley bottom area.

Layers

AttributeTypeMetricsDescription
Active Channel LinesLinestringConfinement Ratio, Constriction Ratiocenterline of all natural and anthropogenic channel(s) within the valley bottom
Tier 1 Gemorphic UnitsPolygonActive Channel Ratio, Active Floodplain Ratio, Inactive Floodplain Ratiolandforms shaped and distinguished by vertical flood stage height
MarginsLinestringNAbounding extent of the channel, valley bottom, valley, or anthropogenic feature.
Confining MarginsLinestringConfining Margin Length, Confinement Ratio, Constriction Ratioabutment of the channel against the valley bottom, valley, or anthropogenic margin(s). Defined as the confining extent that constrains a channel’s form or function

Layer Attributes

Active Channel Lines

Channel TypeDescription
Primarylongest continuous mainstem channel in the valley bottom.
Non-Primaryall other channel threads in the valley bottom. This includes anabranches, tributaries, braided channels, canals, or beaver canals that are separate from or connected to the primary channel.

Tier 1 Geomorphic Units

Geomorphic Unit TypeDescription
ChannelPortion of valley bottom that is inundated by bankfull flow. Evidence of channel includes
Active FloodplainPortion of valley bottom that is frequently flooded by the contemporary flood regime. Evidence of active floodplain can include active riparian vegetation, alluvial flood deposits, wood deposition, etc.
Inactive FloodplainPortion of valley bottom that is not flooded or rarely flooded by the contemporary flood regime. Evidence of inactive floodplain can include relic riparian vegetation, upload vegetation encroachment, remnant alluvial and wood deposits, etc.
TerraceRelic floodplain that is no longer flooded by the maximum contemporary flood regime. This includes floodplains that were once inundated by historic flood regimes before channel downcutting and resulting incision disconnected the channel from these floodplains and created new ones at lower elevations.
Alluvial Fanfan-shaped sediment deposit formed where a channel exits a high-sloped area and enters a low-sloped area. These features consist of well-sorted alluvium that is deposited as the channel's velocity decreases.
Colluvial Fancone-shaped deposit of loose, poorly sorted sediment (colluvium) that forms at the base of a hillslope. It's created by unchanneled, gravity-driven processes like sheet wash or rainwash.
Moraineridge-like deposit of compact, unsorted sediment (glacial till) formed by a melting or retreating glacier.
Hillslope/Uplandsteeply-sloped landforms outside of the valley margins. These features were never flooded or shaped by the historical flood regime and consist of colluvium or bedrock.

Margins

Tier 1 TypeDescription
Channel Marginouter extent of a channel, defined by its banks.
Valley Bottom Marginouter extent of the valley bottom, defined by terraces or fans.
Valley Marginouter extent of the valley, defined by hillslopes.
Marign OriginDescription
Anthropogeniccreated or influenced by human activity
Naturalformed by riverscape processes
Natural and Anthropogeniccreated, influenced, or formed by both riverscape processes and human activity. For example, a natural embankment with a wall built on top.
Tier 2 TypeDescription
Embankmentartificial bank, wall, or mound, typically constructed with earthen materials such as soil, rock, or other aggregates. Its primary purpose is to provide an elevated platform for infrastructure to reduce flooding risk.
Fencefreestanding structure designed to enclose, delineate, or obstruct an area. It is typically constructed from a series of posts, wire, panels, or other components.
Hedgerowbarrier composed of a densely vegetated, layered planting of woody shrubs or trees. Traditionally used to limit soil erosion near the banks of rivers.
Constructed Leveetype of embankment specifically designed and engineered to contain, control, or divert the flow of a river and mitigate flooding.
Railroadnetwork or series of tracks used to transport trains.
Roadleveled pathway typically made of asphalt, concrete, or dirt designed to transport vehicles
Wallupright structure typically made of concrete that serves to enclose, divide, or protect an area.

Confining Margins

Confinement TypeDescription
Leftconfining margin on river-left (looking downstream) bank
Rightconfining margin on river-right (looking downstream) bank
Bothconfining margin on both river banks

Metric Attributes

MetricDescriptionCalculation
Confining Margin Lengthsum of all confining margins digitized by the userSum(Confining Margin Lengths)
Confinement Ratioratio of confining margins classified as 'left' or 'right' normalized by the primary channel centerlineSum (Length of Confining Margins [‘Right’ + ‘Left’]) / Length of Primary Channel
Constriction Ratioratio of confining margins classified as ‘both’ normalized by the primary channel centerline.Sum (Length of Confining Margins [‘Both’]) / Length of Primary Channel*2
Active Channel Ratioproportion of the valley bottom that is inundated by bankfull flow. This includes channel polygons digitized in the Tier 1 Geomorphic Unit layer.Sum (Channel Area) / Total Valley Bottom Area
Active Floodplain Ratioproportion of the valley bottom that is flooded by the contemporary flood regime. This includes active floodplain polygons digitized in the Tier 1 Geomorphic Unit layer.Sum (Active Floodplain Area) / Total Valley Bottom Area
Inactive Floodplain Ratioproportion of the valley bottom that is not flooded by the contemporary flood regime. This includes inactive floodplain polygons digitized in the Tier 1 Geomorphic Unit layer.Sum (Inactive Floodplain Area) / Total Valley Bottom Area

References

Bennett, S.N., Wheaton, J.M., Bouwes, N., Jordan, C.E., Macfarlane, W.W., Maestas, J.D., Portugal, E. and Shahverdian, S.M., 2019. Chapter 3 – Planning for Low-Tech Process-Based Restoration. In: J.M. Wheaton, S.N. Bennett, N. Bouwes, J.D. Maestas and S.M. Shahverdian (Editors), Low-Tech Process-Based Restoration of Riverscapes: Design Manual. Utah State University Restoration Consortium, Logan, Utah. pp. 57.

Wheaton, J.M., Fryirs, K.A., Brierley, G., Bangen, S.G., Bouwes, N. and O'Brien, G., 2015. Geomorphic mapping and taxonomy of fluvial landforms. Geomorphology, 248, pp.273-295.