Skip to main content

Rapid Riverscape Health Survey Protocol

Warning: Experimental Protocol

This protocol is experimental and has not been finalized by the protocol owner. It can be changed at anytime which can break existing data or cause data loss. Please backup data if using this protocol.

Overview

The Rapid Riverscape Health Survey Protocol (RRHS) is a streamlined adaptation of the LTPBR V2 framework. It is designed to assess geomorphic and ecological health through rapid field estimates and site-specific observations. By prioritizing reach-scale insights, the RRHS offers practitioners the flexibility needed for broad scale assessments by prioritizing speed and efficiency.

The primary advantage of the RRHS is its shift from detailed data inventories to representative estimation. For example, when assessing beaver activity in a dense meadow complex, a surveyor can estimate the total dam count through a survey point rather than individually mapping hundreds of individual structures. This allows for broader spatial coverage without sacrificing the data quality needed to make informed management decisions.

The RRHS can be used for many low-tech applications such as restoration planning, long-term monitoring, and adaptive management. It utilizes a multi-layered approach to describe riverscape health such as:

  • Valley Bottom Condition: Defines the boundaries and health of the channel, floodplain, and riparian vegetation zones

  • Stream Complexity: Describes the diverity of flow paths via channel junctions (e.g., confluences, diffluences, etc.) and inundation type.

  • Geomorphic Activity: Characterizes the diversity and distribution of Tier 2 geomorphic units, such as riffles, pools, and bars.

  • Structural Elements: Evaluates wood recruitment through the distribution and density of natural or man-made structures (wood jams, beaver dams, etc).

Protocol Summary

AttributeValue
NameRapid Riverscape Heath Survey Protocol
StatusExperimental Grade
Version1.0
XML URLhttps://github.com/Riverscapes/RiverscapesXML/blob/master/QRiS/protocols/rrhs_protocol.xml
CitationWeber N., Wheaton J.M., Shalcross A., Al-Chokhachy R, Bailey P., Bartelt K., Bennett S., Bouwes B., Bouwes N., Gilbert J., Dickard M., Heitke J., Jordan C., Glassic H., MacFarlane W.W., Miller S., Saunders C., Whitehead K. 2024. Low-Tech Process-Based Restoration Design and Monitoring Protocol: Standard Methods for Developing Project Designs and Assessing Riverscape Health. Version 2.0. Prepared by Anabranch Solutions and Utah State University Riverscapes Assessment and Monitoring Lab. Prepared for the Bureau of Land Management. Logan, UT. 81 pp. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13769899
AuthorNick Weber

Layers & Metrics

LayersMetricsDescription
Active Channel %Percent InundatedPercent of Valley Bottom Classified as Active Channel
Active Floodplain %Percent Active FloodplainPercent of Valley Bottom Classified as Active Floodplain
Inactive Floodplain %Percent Inactive FloodplainPercent of Valley Bottom Classified as Inactive Floodplain

Video Demonstration

Layer Attributes

TypeDescription
Active ChannelThe portion of the valley bottom classified as part of the active channel under the current geomorphic and hydrologic conditions.
Active FloodplainThe portion of the valley bottom classified as part of the active floodplain under the current geomorphic and hydrologic conditions.
Inactive FloodplainThe portion of the valley bottom that is not part of the active channel or floodplain under current geomorphic and hydrologic conditions.

Metric Atributes

MetricDescription
Percent InundatedThe percent of the riverscape that is inundated
Percent Active FloodplainThe proportion of the riverscape that is active floodplain
Percent Inactive FloodplainThe proportion of the riverscape that is inactive floodplain

Resources

Weber et al. 2024

Low-Tech Process-Based Restoration Design and Monitoring Protocol: Standard Methods for Developing Project Designs and Assessing Riverscape Health