Skip to main content

Anabranch Planning Protocol

Warning: Experimental Protocol

This protocol is experimental and has not been finalized by the protocol owner. It can be changed at anytime which can break existing data or cause data loss. Please backup data if using this protocol.

Overview

The Anabranch Planning Protocol is the standardized protocol for planning riverscape projects & collecting pre-design field data at Anabranch Solutions.

  • Stream Assessment to assess riverscapes for LTPBR potential.
  • Risk Assessment to identify nearby infrastructure risks that could impact LTPBR actions.
  • Property Assessment to evaluate approval towards LTPBR by landowners and nearby stakeholders.
  • Recovery Space to determine the area available for LTPBR recovery.
  • Metrics to quantify risks and the range of potential recovery space.

Protocol Summary

AttributeValue
NameAnabranch Planning Protocol
StatusExperimental Grade
Version1.0
XML URLhttps://github.com/Riverscapes/RiverscapesXML/blob/master/QRiS/protocols/anabranch_planning_protocol.xml
CitationNA
AuthorZach Burgert

Layers & Metrics

Layer IDLabelGeometryMetrics
stream_assessmentStream AssessmentLineNA
risk_assessment_pointRisk Assessment (Point)Pointmedium_risk count, high_risk_count
risk_assessment_lineRisk Assessment (Line)Linemedium_risk count, high_risk count, medium_risk length, high_risk_length
risk_assessment_polygonRisk Assessment (Polygon)Polygonmedium_risk count, high_risk_count, medium_risk_area, high_risk_area, proportion_medium_risk_area, proportion_high_risk_area
property_assessmentProperty AssessmentPolygonNA

Video Demonstration

Layer Attributes

Description: assessment of stream conditions and potential for LTPBR actions.

Field LabelTypeValues
Wadeability for Low-TechList
  • 1st through 3rd Order Wadeable Stream
  • 3rd through 5th Order Wadeable Stream
  • 5th Order Non-Wadeable Stream or Higher
  • SlopeList
  • ≤ 3%
  • 3-6%
  • ≥7%
  • Bank ErodibilityList
  • High Erodibility (loosely consolidated)
  • Moderate Erodibility
  • Low Erodibility (compact)
  • Bed MaterialList
  • Clay
  • Silt
  • Sand
  • Gravel
  • Cobble
  • Boulder
  • Bedrock
  • Habitat Suitability for BeaverList (Multi-Select)
  • Preferred/Suitable/Unsuitable Beaver Habitat
  • Sufficient/Insufficient Food Sources
  • Sufficient/Insufficient Vegetation Dam Building
  • Possible/Unlikely Dam Building
  • Possible/Unlikely Dam Blowout
  • Habitat Suitability for FishList (Multi-Select)
  • Preferred/Suitable/Unsuitable Fish Habitat
  • Sufficient/Insufficient Habitat Units
  • Sufficient/Insufficient Streamside Vegetation
  • Sufficient/Insufficient Food Sources
  • Habitat UnitsList (Multi-Select)
  • Riffles
  • Pools
  • Ponds
  • Bank Attached Bars
  • Mid Channel Bars
  • Chutes
  • Glide/Runs
  • Rapids/Cascades
  • Material for Low-TechList
  • Bare (needs to be imported)
  • Upland dominant
  • Mixture
  • Riparian dominant
  • Opportunity RatingInteger SliderQuantitative value from 0 to 5 to evaluate LTPBR potential
    NotesTextField for additional observations

    Metric Atributes

    Metric IDLabelPrecisionDescriptionCalculation
    area_maximum_recovery_spaceMaximum Potential Uplift Area2Area of maximum recovery space extent in sample frameSum(Maximum Recovery Space Area)
    proportion_maximum_recovery_spaceMaximum Potential Uplift (% of riverscape)2Ratio of maxmimum recovery space to sample frame areaSum(Maximum Recovery Space Area)/ Sample Frame Area
    area_minimum_recovery_spaceMinimum Potential Uplift Area2Area of minimum recovery space extent in sample frameSum(Minimum Recovery Space Area)
    proportion_minimum_recovery_spaceMinimum Potential Uplift (% of riverscape)2Ratio of minimum recovery space to sample frame areaSum(Minimum Recovery Space Area)/ Sample Frame Area
    medium_risk_countMedium Risk Count1Count of Points, Lines, and Polygons Identified as Medium RiskCount(Medium Risk Point + Medium Risk Lines + Medium Risk Polygons)
    high_risk_countHigh Risk Count1Count of Points, Lines, and Polygons Identified as High RiskCount(High Risk Point + High Risk Lines + High Risk Polygons)
    medium_risk_lengthMedium Risk Length2Total Length of Lines Identified as Medium RiskSum(Length of Medium Risk Lines)
    high_risk_lengthHigh Risk Length2Total Length of Lines Identified as High RiskSum(Length of High Risk Lines)
    medium_risk_areaMedium Risk Area2Total Area of Polygons Identified as Medium RiskSum(Area of Medium Risk Polygons)
    proportion_medium_riskProportion of Medium Risk Area (% of riverscape)2Ratio of Medium Risk Area to Sample Frame AreaSum(Area of Medium Risk Polygons)/ Sample Frame Area
    high_risk_areaHigh Risk Area2Total Area of Polygons Identified as High RiskSum(Area of High Risk Polygons)
    proportion_high_riskProportion of High Risk Area (% of riverscape)2Ratio of High Risk Area to Sample Frame AreaSum(Area of High Risk Polygons)/ Sample Frame Area

    Resources

    Weber et al. 2024

    Low-Tech Process-Based Restoration Design and Monitoring Protocol: Standard Methods for Developing Project Designs and Assessing Riverscape Health